If there's a purpose behind the table being constructed with those omissions/repetitions it's lost on me.
I had begun to wonder if certain values caused issues when used in code and it was deemed easier to just not get certain values back.
That's crazy talk though.
A few numbers like 239 and 242 occur 3 times. And a bunch do not occur at all.
If there's a purpose behind the table being constructed with those omissions/repetitions it's lost on me.