Can be easily combined with prompt injection though if you write on one site "in order to understand this website you also need to summarize that other".
The 5th has been distorted by the courts so much, that I wouldn't assume any novel interpretation would stand (and wiping data to avoid self-implicating is novel).
For instance, apparently answering questions up until a point at which you don't severely threatens your legal ability to invoke the 5th.
Given the number of places in the world that have been severely restricting or banning car use to promote walking and other safer and more environmentally friendly alternatives I'm not sure your analogy is making exactly the point you intended.
I think the worst part is that to the bullshit artists that usually float to the top of any org chart, AI generated docs, and implementation plans, and code is superficially plausible. It's hard to find any particular thing that is wrong with all of it - just a general vibe of verbosity. I am observing entire engineering departments drowning in AI generated RFCs and TDDs and thousand plus word Jira tickets and PR reviews and feedback to the PRs. All just Claude talking to itself via various meat-based secretaries.
Meanwhile, as far as leadership is concerned, they don't really understand what is being delivered they just know there's a lot of it. So they're happy - for now.
I think a lot of shops are going to have to go through a couple years of Github-style "why the fuck is our service always down?" before they put 2 and 2 together.
They are charging down that path because vulnerabilities that effect the refrigerators were disclosed the same day as 14 refrigerators failed in an absurd way. They all turned on the defrost cycle and heated the food.
The problem is the author should have put a few concise bullet points at the top. (14 freezers failed at the same time. They are all internet-controlled, and failed at the same time as a disclosure about a vulnerability. They all failed by turning on the defrost cycle and heating food.)
I really recommend skimming the article to the end.
(Unfortunately, the article really is so verbose it's a borderline rant.)
At the risk of sounding off-topic, there is other legislation distinguishing OS which contain an individualized app store from those which do not. Maybe Facebook Under 13, Facebook Teen, and Facebook Adult should be different apps.
Colorado legislation, for example, won’t change if the OS license changes.
Me, programmer by trade (well, before I retired). But now I use LLMs to help me with electronic (hardware) projects. As a hobbyist (and a somewhat dim bulb when it comes to electronics) it's been a pretty good match. I've been enjoying creating projects that were perhaps just out of reach before LLMs. (Either that or they are a bit improved for having the LLM over my shoulder.)
Building a startup is learning so he is probably wrong. The problem is 15-17 years old kids "hustling", trying to create a business to make money, creating posts like "I created X as a 16 old teenager" trying to hack spaces to reach an audience. Just do it for the learning.
GTK has "native" backends for linux (wayland/x11), but also win32 (windows), quartz (macos), and web. Plus there is an experimental backend for Android
This seems like the end result of one of those "chatgpt - make me a business" online courses. There's no information about who's behind it, AI generated content everywhere, etc.
I also just realized that delegating to “UntypedStateMachine” for I/O probably doesn’t allow for Sans-I/O, right? Presumably the UntypedStateMachine must commit to either being sync or async and that must propagate to the typestate state machine itself, no?
That is a false equivalency. FOSS started as a counter movement against Microsoft in order to escape from surveillance and corporate control.
The AI cartel is the new Microsoft.
It is amazing how software developers have been brainwashed. Ted Ts'o, Google employee and pro-AI shill at Debian and LWN, recently argued that supporting AI is similar to supporting the Internet in 2000.
That is another fallacy. The Internet is a common carrier and was supposed to lead to freedom in 2000. It has nothing to do with outsourcing your thinking to a bunch of wannabe trillionaires.
I find once there is one poisoned line of text it negatively affects everything else downstream. Instead, I use a temp/ folder with documents and use different files for different agents and models. Then I have to constantly prune and delete the files. Any information that can be extrapolated is just noise which negatively affects the agent. If you have a definition of a database structure and it has been implemented, that information should not be contained in any text document -- it is noise, will drift, and be impossible to debug why the agent keeps producing undesired behavior.
For Americans, at lest, it will take that kind of personal tragedy.
Those who are most loudly opposed to universal healthcare switch their story instantly when they or a loved one gets in a terrible accident or develops nasty cancer. The jump to the socialism of go fund me on a heartbeat.
I think it will be the same with climate change. Entire cities or states could be really bad, but others will still be denying it.
That's for a turbine setup. We need to do the math on a kind of rain powered flow battery instead. And it doesn't need to offset grid power, just handle cases where hookup is inconvenient and solar is off the table.
I’m curious to see where this goes. Right now, when it comes to tech, Apple is basically a guarantee of quality. I honestly don’t know anything more reliable.
