Notice the blatant verbal blunder the reporter makes in the first few minutes, she says: "SOPA would allow the government and private companies to shut down websites enabling copyright infringement..."
Is there a word missing there perhaps? A word that we've become accustomed to in its routine presence in the media?
When members of the media talk about crimes the word "alleged" might as well be "uh" given the frequency it drops from their mouths. But not here.
Even a news outlet as savvy as Bloomberg is utterly clueless about the pitfalls of erasing the presumption of innocence and due process for the online world.
Is there a word missing there perhaps? A word that we've become accustomed to in its routine presence in the media?
When members of the media talk about crimes the word "alleged" might as well be "uh" given the frequency it drops from their mouths. But not here.
Even a news outlet as savvy as Bloomberg is utterly clueless about the pitfalls of erasing the presumption of innocence and due process for the online world.