Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I understand the naming issue but from the look of it the extension only works locally, where's the issue with that?


they don't want people injecting javascript on their website. That's all there's to it. I'm not sending anything anywhere. I'm not storing anything. I'm not profiting from it.


> they don't want people injecting javascript on their website

They should send an email to every extension author ever, and maybe even browser vendors for supporting such a malicious feature.


...and then notify every ISP, every place that offers free public Wi-Fi, every airline that has Wi-Fi on their planes, anyone else who injects code into web pages...


But I do this already with an ad blocker…


Don't think they can enforce this at all, I would just change the name and call it a day. The burden is on you though, certainly no one can force you to make decisions. :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: